Zodiac Killer

High School
2 pages (500 words)
“Zodiac Killer” was the term used by an executioner who operated in the San Francisco Bay region, including Solano, Napa, and Vallejo counties, in the 1960s and 70s. Zodiac mailed encrypted messages to local newspapers, and took credit for murders while giving notice of more to come, as said by Robert Graysmith, who individually probed the murders. Police recognized seven massacres and two attempted slaughters to Zodiac on account of information he was capable of providing, and that was not within the public domain, although the amount of unsubstantiated victims may be higher (Haugen, 2011).

In a planet of serialized killers, one may regard the Zodiac Killer to be a stride ahead of the rest. Being a serial slayer vigorous in Northern California, he was remarkable not only for his killing extravaganza and puzzling ciphers sent to newsrooms and police, but also for the reality that he escaped with the crimes, as his personality was by no means revealed. The police’s principal suspect was Arthur Leigh Allen; however, his fingerprints, DNA, and handwriting never matched those left behind with the killer, and he was consequently not charged. He passed on of a heart attack. The latest Zodiac Killer suspect is Jack Tarrance, whose stepson discovered a black hood similar to that of the killer; in addition to undeveloped sets of pictures that Tarrance’s stepson states contain shocking photos of the slaughters. None of the proof has been verified, although the case is still open and dynamic. After his killings, the murderer sent ciphers (preset messages) to local daily’s and the police, stating that the letters would disclose his identity. Typically, however, they unraveled nothing but mysterious rants and warnings against more victims (Penn, 1987).

The art of probing a crime scene is the idea that has not altered all through history. An investigator basically looks for things that do not seem to be at the scene naturally, anything that could have been utilized in the crime, anything that is the product of the crime or anything that just turns out to be conspicuous. Throughout history, we have discovered plenty of issues that may be helpful to the investigation for instance a 18th century inspector would barely think about picking a single human hair for investigation; however, the indispensable principle has stayed the same. It is in the course of this search that proof is sited. The Zodiac killer was an exceptional character who became the symbolic serial killer in American folklore. Back in the late 60s, the police had no idea of what to make of someone like Zodiac. He was vicious enough to have his personal costumes, his unique codes and secret messages. He presented the police with all the evidence they required to apprehend him, but they simply could not break the code. The best they did was to force Zodiac into a stalemate (Fox, et al., 2008).

Nevertheless, I’m still convinced that identifying Arthur Leigh Allen, the condemned child molester, as the Zodiac murderer was the right call, although we can never be 100% sure. The outcome was that he went scot free. Allen was the very last example of a syndicate who could work that liberally for that long, in an epoch prior to the coming of DNA verification and new communications technology. I spoke to an LAPD officer lately who believed that if Zodiac had utilized a cell phone at that point in time, they would have caught him in less than ten minutes flat.


Fox, J. A., Levin, J., & Quinet, K. (2008). The will to kill: Making sense of senseless murder. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Haugen, B. (2011). The Zodiac killer: Terror and mystery. Mankato, MN: Compass Point Books.

Penn, G. (1987). Times 17: The amazing story of the Zodiac murders in California and Massachusetts, 1966-1981. S.l.: Foxglove Press.