Microsoft Windows 10 and Mac OS High Sierra
|Type:||Compare and Contrast Essay|
|Topics:||Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science, Data Analysis, Innovation|
Table of Contents
MAC OS High Sierra High Sierra
MAC OS High Sierra High Sierra is among the newest operating systems from the MAC Corporation. In file management, uses its multithreading as well as multitasking ability. At the same time, its features offer an environment that is easy to work in. it accesses many files at the same time. MAC OS High Sierra is also popular for its high value graphic properties. Since it has a Launchpad and a bird’s-eye of the Dashboard as well as desktop, MAC OS High Sierra easily opens applications and files for its users (Pate, 2003). File formats in MAC are different from those in Windows and can only be opened in MAC environment. Disk Formatting in MAC is similar to Windows as it uses GUI API application utility.
Windows 10 is a 64 bit operating system from Microsoft Corporation. Windows 10 creates and also transfers files from one location to another including remotely (Carrier, 2005). It operates files in a variety of formats. In Windows 10, the operating system uses a specific location for program and files that exclusively support the operating system. Windows rely on graphical user API applications as well as command line interface, capabilities. Both interfaces are available in Windows but MAC solely relies on GUI API.
Benefits of File management in windows 10
In Windows 10, the storage drives are located using letters. A user can decide on the partition of choice to use depending on the available space. The primary drive that hosts the Windows 10 operating system is the Drive “C”. It is the drive in which the operating system boots and supports all other file transfer operations (Russinovich, Solomon & Ionescu, 2009). Just like in MAC operating system, Windows 10 offers multi-tasking features. Windows automatically detect the presence of files and cannot support the existence files in a similar format and an exactly the same name. File management wizards automatically intervene to assist users on the selection of appropriate actions, whether to delete, rename files, replace the file or cancel the actions. In Windows 10, files face attacks by malware applications, while in MAC, there is limited malware attack. However, Windows 10 offers file and data recovery capability.
Formatting of windows 10 is done in NTFS, with the exception of multi-boot configurations.
Formatting of Windows 10 partitions using NTFS is preferred against FAT due to the many features available in NTFS. First, it offers recoverability so that no user is forced to run disk repair applications in the NTFS volume. Secondly, NTFS offers assurance of file system consistency in the volume through normal transaction log and recovery methods. According to Arpaci-Dusseau & Arpaci-Dusseau (2014), during system failure, NTFS refers to the logs as well as checkpoint information to perform automatic system restoration of the system, data, and creation of ERD (emergency repair disk).
Windows 10 also supports the compression of file, which is enabled by NTFS volumes. After compression of the files in an NTFS volume, they can be written and read in any Windows-oriented system and program, and there is no need of requisite decompressed for it to be read (Silberschatz, Galvin & Gagne, 2004). At the point of reading, decompression takes place automatically. At the point of closure, the file goes through compression and windows 10 automatically prompt the saving.
Disadvantages of File Management in Windows 10
In file management, File management uses various systems, such as File Allocation Table NTFS, Live File System and lately, Resilient File System (RFS), which requires a minimum of Windows 8 to operate.
Benefits of File management in MAC OS High Sierra High Sierra
Better File Backups
Apple’s present file management system applies time-stamping on files with an accuracy of one-second. MAC 10 offers APFS time-stamping on files with an accuracy of one nanosecond cloning feature simplifies the storage of multiple file versions in the smallest space possible (Tanenbaum, 2007). MAC 10 High Sierra version increases the efficiency and performance by fine-graining of file backups.
Storage Space Management
One advantage of the MAC 10 is the flexible management of storage space, in which two distinct spaces are shared disk whenever resources need them. In MAC 10 High Sierra, APFS file system cannot fill the storage spaces in the hard drive.
Optimization of Flash
MAC 10 optimizes files for flash memory storage. It thus minimizes the wastage of storage space in disks, while managing the dynamic expansion and compression of disk (Tanenbaum et al, 2006).
Disadvantages of File Management in MAC OS High Sierra High Sierra
Even though there are many desirable features, there are a number of issues to be watched very closely. The greatest is about the compatibility with other operating systems. Some users have MAC 10 integrated with a Windows partition, a creation of Apple’s Boot Camp. This compels the users to acquire Windows driver to read the APFS disk in the same manner as Apple does in providing a Windows – based driver to read HFS+ disks.
In a similar way, developers as well as other users with the habit of dual-booting their Mac operating systems MAC 10 High Sierra and previous versions of Operating systems will not be able to gain access to the APFS disk partition if the partition run the present version, El Capitan or any previous versions.
- Arpaci-Dusseau, R. H. & Arpaci-Dusseau, A. C. (2014). Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces. Arpaci-Dusseau Books.
- Carrier, B. (2005). File System Forensic Analysis. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-321-26817-2.
- Pate, S. D. (2003). UNIX Filesystems: Evolution, Design, and Implementation. Wiley.
- Russinovich, M., Solomon, D. A. & Ionescu, A. (2009). “File Systems”. Windows Internals (5th ed.). Microsoft Press.
- Silberschatz, A., Galvin, P. B. & Gagne, G. (2004). “Storage Management”. Operating System Concepts (7th ed.). Wiley.
- Tanenbaum, A. S. (2007). Modern operating Systems (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Tanenbaum, Andrew S.; Woodhull, Albert S. (2006). Operating Systems: Design and Implementation (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.